The Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918: More Devastating Than WW1

A chart showing a spike in Spanish Flu cases

The Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918: More Devastating Than WW1

Public service announcement instructing people what they could do to fight the flu
Public service announcements told people what they could do to fight the flu

Most years the flu is nothing more than an annoyance, killing only a small percentage of the population.  One pandemic, the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918, went on to become the most devastating in human history.  (This post is a companion piece to Melina Druga’s WWI Trilogy, Angel of Mercy, Those Left Behind and Adjustment Year, available wherever eBooks are sold.)

Despite the name, the virus did not originate in Spain. Spain was neutral in World War I.  As a consequence, its newspapers were not censored, and reporters spoke openly about the disease’s spread.

The pandemic began in spring 1918 and ended in summer 1919.  Most patients passed away from secondary infections, particularly pneumonia.

Death came quickly, often within days or even hours, as the lungs filled with fluid and suffocated the victim to death.  The person’s skin would turn blue from lack of oxygen.

Society Reacts

An Spanish Flu pandemic patient arrives at the hospital via ambulance, 1918
Medical personnel were soon overwhelmed by the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic

Makeshift hospitals were constructed in some areas to handle the influx of ill, but medical personnel soon became overwhelmed. Many doctors and nurses fell ill themselves.

The sheer number of ill and dead hampered society.  In many industries, there weren’t enough workers to keep businesses running.  Funeral homes, for example, were so understaffed they had difficulty finding enough people to help bury the dead.

Any place where large numbers of people congregated, such as cinemas, schools and churches, were closed in an effort to curtail the disease’s spread.

People were encouraged to wear masks, and public-service ads advised the best ways to avoid spreading the disease.

The Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918 was Different 

A chart showing a spike in Spanish Flu cases
Spanish Flu pandemic mortality in Europe and North America in 1918-19

Medical personnel quickly discovered that the 1918 pandemic was different from previous flu pandemics.

In addition to the high pneumonia rates, it differed in other ways as well.

  • It killed mostly healthy, young people.
  • The cause of death was often the body’s overreaction to the virus.
  • Usually ill people stay home. On the Western and Eastern Fronts, it was healthy people who stayed put while the ill were transported to hospitals. This exposed others to the virus.
  • The death toll was 20 percent. In a typical year, the flu kills less than one percent of those affected.
  • Entire families were wiped out.

Deadliest Pandemic

A makeshift hospital housing Spanish Flu patients
A makeshift hospital housing Spanish Flu patients

The deadliest month in the pandemic was October.  In many communities, residents violated quarantine when they poured into the streets to celebrate Armistice the following month.

In that moment, joy overtook the fear of contagion.

Here are seven facts about the flu:

  • The flu came in three waves. The first in the spring of 1918, the second in August and the third in autumn. The second two waves were more virulent than the first.
  • Pregnant women had the highest death rate, up to 70 percent.
  • People who contracted the flu during the 1890 pandemic were less affected by Spanish flu. Those who survived the first wave of Spanish flu also were immune to the second two waves.
  • Every part of the globe was affected, even isolated islands.
  • It is estimated up to 100 million people died globally. This makes the death toll higher than that of the war.
  • It also killed more people than Black Death in the Middle Ages.
  • It is believed stress and malnutrition caused by the war contributed to the death toll.

To learn more about the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918, read my book A Tale of Two Nations: Canada, U.S. and WW1.

The WWI Trilogy by Melina Druga
The WWI Trilogy by Melina Druga: Angel of Mercy, Those Left Behind and Adjustment Year

Join the mailing list to receive updates on new blog posts, book launches, video releases and more.


Updated: 20 October 2020
Melina Druga
Latest posts by Melina Druga (see all)
Melina Druga is a multi-genre author with a lifelong love of history, books and the English language. She pens historical fiction, chick lit and nonfiction.

2 thoughts on “The Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918: More Devastating Than WW1

  1. I can’t really venture a guess about when the next pandemic might occur. There have been plenty of scares lately, though, especially with ebola.

    I must admit that I am wondering how a lack of involvement in the war and also a lack of newspaper censorship translated into a flu virus being named after the country of Spain. I suppose they were somehow trying to equate the spread of the virus with the two things, but I’m not quite sure about the logic involved. Perhaps it is really only something that the people of the time would understand?

    1. No, that is incorrect. Because Spain was a neutral nation and its newspapers were uncensored, it meant that media coverage of the pandemic was more thorough and complete, giving contemporaries the incorrect impression that the flu was worse in Spain than other areas.

Comments are closed.

Back To Top